Link

the liturgical experts

I was talking to a priest last week, and among other things I mentioned how the catechesis I’d received in RCIA was very, very firm on the point that there should be absolutely no private prayer during mass. Instead, all attention should be immediately focussed ‘on the action’ being carried out. I’d been very perturbed by this, because what is prayer? Just putting myself in God’s presence and meditating on that feels like prayer, and if I get some kind of spiritual thought that’s just my own, that’s wrong? So I had asked one of the sponsors in my group if she didn’t also think that this prohibition was fairly tyrannical, and she’d said, “Don’t question Father. You know he’s a liturgical expert.”

When I retold this story, the priest laughed–as the tyranny of the ‘Vatican II liturgical expert’ is a phenomenon the whole world over–and quipped, “Well, I’m a Christian, and I wanna pray. How ’bout that?”

Really, critiques of this don’t get much better than that.

Link

My grasp of time-telling in an anecdote…

…I thought my train was at 11.45am. It’s at 1.45pm, so here I am in a Subway in New Orleans that looks like it was last refurbished in 1978 (nothing wrong with that) and that is very adamant about NO REFILLS for fountain drinks. Perhaps one could try to make a case for 24h time displays instead, but then I’d have turned up at 3.45 for a 1.45pm train, and that would’ve been decidedly worse. C’est la vie.

My fountain drink is huge, though.

Some monk-foot-made wine for you?

I met some Norbertine canons this week—they really are wonderful priests and quite hilarious people—and also some of their boys from the affiliated prep school. The boys were absolutely excited to show us this video and to point out their teachers and priests, but we all could not help but notice that if one had not known that it was a vocations video, one might very easily think that it is either an ad for a vineyard dedicated to home-grown organic wine, or something. (The boys, at the wine-making scene: ’They don’t really do that. They planted olive trees, but I think no one watered ‘em, so they died.”)

I love that, that it’s so very slightly bumbling.

Link

on “Our Lady”

This was in the announcements before the homily today (and yesterday, so I was very tickled to hear it again): solemnly, the priest said, “Our Lady requires men to carry her in procession this Wednesday; if you are interested to help, please contact Father Joshua.”

‘Our Lady requires men to carry her’–I was struck by how chivalric it sounded; immediately there was a tug at my heart, for there is a particular sweetness to the phenomenon of men (and boys, but especially grown men) acceding graciously to a noble lady–by which I include in the same breath their earthly mothers, monarchs, and Our Lady.

We’ve discussed this among my friends before, that there’s something so humbling and lovely about men with strong Marian devotions, just like there’s something particular about men who treat their mothers with sweetness and devotion. Daughters, of course, can have a tendency of viciousness towards their mothers, or a seasoned indifference, but the soliticiousness of a daughter is different from that of a son. A son’s is all the more distinguished by how counter-cultural it is. Like St John Paul II, for example, and his episcopal motto of Totus Tuus, or St Maximilian Kolbe and his devotion to the Immaculate Virgin.

As people keep trying to impress upon me this trip–and yes, God, if You’re reading my blog I’m beginning to get the message–Marian devotion is one of the best ways, if not an essential way, to grow in the spiritual life. She, after all, is the foremost among the apostles and Christians, and knows Jesus better than any human person did or would; it was her hand a toddler Jesus innocently clasped. (That image occurred to me this morning, and it’s been hard to shake.)

But there’s practising Marian devotions, like faithfully saying the rosary, or the Little Office, or wearing a scapular or any number of other things, and then there’s living Marian devotion. Like volunteering to bear Our Lady’s statue on your shoulder, to be at her service.

Link

Walking among steeples; Chicago outside the Art Institute

After my adventures in the Art Institute I set out for the Pauline bookstore and other errands, and finally St John’s. The funny thing about travelling as a nerdy Catholic in Chicago is that because the terrain is so flat, and the churches generally so large and Gothic (at least, the urban ones) that steeples are everywhere when you look out. I like this very much.

Taste of Chicago! Expensive, didn’t taste much, except nondescript pizza. (Sorry, Miss Connie.)

$8.50 for 12, but when a half-slice is 5 coupons and a bottle of pop is 7…

Breaded steak? USA.

It’s possible to get a sense for which steeples are Catholic and which are not. This wasn’t, but it led to an open and unattended chapel. This is St Andrew’s Chapel at St James’ Cathedral of the Episcopal Diocese of Chicago.

So lovely and hermit-y.

Look it that altarpiece!

Some stained glass.

Candles at the Marian shrine bit. Yep, Marian.

Below this is the inscription, “Blessed art thou among women…”


Thought it was very funny that the Cathedral proudly sits at 666 Rush Street.

What was this???

Holy Name!

Its hidden garden and grotto… And its pigeons.

Link

art, you guys

A record of my visit to the Art Institute of Chicago, in two parts.

This is art. (Not pictured: the accompanying two parts, one of green carpet in a column and mounted on the wall, and an unfolded blue handkerchief mounted on an adjacent wall.)

Yes, cat litter. I think regardless of how one feels about SSM and such, one must agree that this piece is a case of mixed metaphors and jumbled overreach.


Actually I quite enjoyed this, just visually speaking.

As I was preparing to take this photo the TV screen was dark, and I thought that was the statement, how we wait around to be entertained by dumb machines–but then something started playing and it was very nihilistic and depressing. Alas.

I don’t think this was meant to be flattering to any of the women depicted.

Yes.

Degas! I love the feet and legs of his bronze dancers.

Edward Hopper is probably my (only) favourite American modern painter. I love the realism, the stark shapes, and the silence that seems to pervade his work. Even Nighthawks, the diner one, has a stillness to it.


And I took this. 

Link

From the outposts


Your correspondent writes to you from a Dunkin’ Donuts at the intersection of Milwaukee and Chicago, where she is breaking fast with a regrettable bagel (Always the egg and cheese wrap! Always! Even if it doesn’t appear on the menu!) and coffee. Life is mysterious as usual and she is ruminating on the eternal sacrifice, man’s perennial longing to be known, and the folly of choosing coffee after a night of caffeine-induced insomnia.

The last one is probably the hardest one to answer.

Link

Yesterday, I said goodbye to the kind people I’d met through the young adults’ group at St John Cantius, as well as their chaplain, who had delivered a reflection that really, really was what I needed. Saying goodbye was nice all around.

Today I went back to the church for Compline, and began to shuffle out when I bumped into the chaplain again. He said hello, and I said sheepishly, “I thought I’d just come back, you know, seeing as I had the time, and it wasn’t too far out…”

And we talked for a while out in front of the doors, looking out at the sunset. I remember saying, “I mean, it’s a lot of time, so I might come back, because its not like I have any pressure to see the sights or something, and anyway what’s better -”

“- than spending all your time in church, right?”

“Exactly. What’s better than spending all your time in church?” 

Then goodbyes and see yous and bless yous were said and I walked away feeling funnily sheepish. Unsurprising, of course, as I’d spent the whole conversation making light of why I’d gone back, and why I’ll want to go back, and, well, the God-given force that impelled me there in the first place. 

I realise I do this all the time, too: whether it’s a hurried explanation prompted by catching the university chaplain’s eye after turning up to mass twice in 12 hours, or going to great lengths to be casual about turning up to things, or the frizzle of shyness that strikes when I say as mumbly as possible, “… one week since my last confession”, I just really want to play it cool. To look like I don’t need this, like I don’t need the grace of the sacraments or the peace of prayer or the uplifting beauty of sacred architecture well-cared-for — to look like I don’t need God, really. I mean, I was just in the neighbourhood, no biggie.

People do this. I just stumbled into this, they say, didn’t really try to be here, but just happened to… It’s okay to say, I want to be here. I came on purpose. More than that, it’s a lie to say otherwise, and it’s a lie that buries an impulse we’d do well to inspect–it’s as if someone had a crush and kept turning up at places where they could interact with their sweetheart, but kept telling others and themselves that they really weren’t trying at all–you get the point. 

That’s what I learned today: there’s no reason to be apologetic about needing God or wanting to be with Him. Human beans we are, we want to be self-sufficient, independent, masters of our own fates, but we’re really not. Just like we have a primordial desire for relationship, we have a deeper one of relationship with God.

In fact, we might be apologetic to others and to ourselves for wanting to seek God, but He surely was not apologetic about wanting to seek us. God Himself became man, first an infant born in undignified straits, and grew into a man Who died in the most public and grotesque way possible, having been debased and abused, but all the while asserting His divinity and the salvific nature of His ministry. He never said, “It was convenient, so I dropped by.”

He says, “I came for you.” If even one sheep is missing the Good Shepherd would abandon the 99 to seek the one, and so He sought us, you and me, at such a cost!

As Matthew Schmitz writes in a feature from the August 2016 issue of First Things,

Christianity is a religion of losers. To the weak and humble, it offers a stripped and humiliated Lord. To those without reason for optimism, it holds up the cross as a sign of hope. To anyone who does not win at life, it promises that whoever loses his life for Christ’s sake shall find it.